Kerney v. Hatfield

162 P. 1079, 30 Idaho 97, 1917 Ida. LEXIS 10
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kerney v. Hatfield. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 Idaho 90
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided January 27, 1917·Published

Opinion

MORGAN, J.

In this case respondents seek to recover judgment from appellant in the sum of $437.50 for labor performed and services rendered for her at her instance and request between June 15, 1913, and October 1st of the same year; also $125 claimed by way of statutory penalty by reason of payment not having been made when due and demanded.

This is a companion case to Kerney et ux. v. Hatfield, ante, p. 90, 162 Pac. 1077. The same proceedings were had in both cases, except that in this the record shows the demurrer was overruled and the time for answer was fixed, while in the other it is silent upon that point.

Upon authority of Kerney et ux. v. Hatfield, supra, the order overruling the motion to vacate the default and set aside the judgment in this case is reversed, with direction to

[98]*98the district court to try the issues framed by the complaint and answer.

Costs are-awarded to appellant.

Budge, C. J., and Rice, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kerney v. Hatfield, 162 P. 1079, 30 Idaho 97, 1917 Ida. LEXIS 10 (Idaho 1917).

162 P. 1079 (Kerney v. Hatfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kerney v. Hatfield
162 P. 1077 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1917)