Kerner v. Kerner

262 A.D.2d 1081, 691 N.Y.S.2d 813
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kerner v. Kerner. Read the opinion of the Court — 262 A.D.2d 1082
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 18, 1999·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

—Amended judgment [1082]*1082unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, Supreme Court’s award of custody of the parties’ child to plaintiff is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record and is not contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171174; Matter of Paul C. v Tracy C., 209 AD2d 955, 956; cf., Matter of Meyers v Halladay, 242 AD2d 887; Fox v Fox, 177 AD2d 209, 211-212). (Appeal from Amended Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J. — Custody.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kerner v. Kerner, 262 A.D.2d 1081, 691 N.Y.S.2d 813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

262 A.D.2d 1081 (Kerner v. Kerner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eschbach v. Eschbach
436 N.E.2d 1260 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Fox v. Fox
177 A.D.2d 209 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Paul C. v. Tracy C.
209 A.D.2d 955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Meyers v. Halladay
242 A.D.2d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)