Kerner v. Kaleko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kerner v. Kaleko

18 A.D.2d 810

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 7, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 810 (Kerner v. Kaleko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kerner v. Kaleko, 18 A.D.2d 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover for moneys had and received for plaintiff’s use and to recover damages for conversion, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dafed September 17, 1962, which granted defendants’ motion to punish him for contempt of court by reason of his refusal and neglect to testify at his pretrial examination and otherwise to obey a subpoena served upon him in connection with such examination. Order [811]*811affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The stay heretofore granted by order of this court, dated October 4, 1962, is vacated. Plaintiff’s time within which to purge himself of the contempt is extended to February 1, 1963, or to such other date as may be mutually fixed by written stipulation of the parties. No opinion. (See Kerner v. Kaleko, 18 A D 2d 810.) Beldoek, P. J., Brennan, Ilill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover for moneys had and received for plaintiff’s use and to recover damages for conversion, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dafed September 17, 1962, which granted defendants’ motion to punish him for contempt of court by reason of his refusal and neglect to testify at his pretrial examination and otherwise to obey a subpoena served upon him in connection with such examination. Order [811]*811affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The stay heretofore granted by order of this court, dated October 4, 1962, is vacated. Plaintiff’s time within which to purge himself of the contempt is extended to February 1, 1963, or to such other date as may be mutually fixed by written stipulation of the parties. No opinion. (See Kerner v. Kaleko, 18 A D 2d 810.) Beldoek, P. J., Brennan, Ilill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerner-v-kaleko-nyappdiv-1963.