Kerner v. Continental Rubber Works

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kerner v. Continental Rubber Works

246 A.D. 700

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Action for a balance due under a contract employing plaintiff as the exclusive foreign representative for the defendant. Order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, vacating plaintiff’s warrant of attachment, and severing the counterclaim and granting partial summary judgment thereon in favor of defendant, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., MeAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for a balance due under a contract employing plaintiff as the exclusive foreign representative for the defendant. Order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, vacating plaintiff’s warrant of attachment, and severing the counterclaim and granting partial summary judgment thereon in favor of defendant, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., MeAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Kerner v. Continental Rubber Works, 246 A.D. 700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 700 (Kerner v. Continental Rubber Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.