Kernan v. Division of Child Support Enforcement

70 F. App'x 481
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 29, 2003·No. No. 02-16200; D.C. No. CV-01-01746-SMM/SLV·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Eugene J. Kernan appeals pro se the district court’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Division of Child Support Enforcement and numerous individual defendants. The claims in Kernan’s complaint are inextricably intertwined with Arizona state court child support proceedings. The district court did not err in dismissing [482] Kernan’s action because under the Rook-er-Feldman doctrine federal district courts lack authority to review state court decisions. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 486-87, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Doe & Assocs. Law Offices v. Napolitano, 252 F.3d 1026, 1029 (9th Cir.2001). Kernan’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kernan v. Division of Child Support Enforcement, 70 F. App'x 481 (9th Cir. 2003).

70 F. App'x 481 (Kernan v. Division of Child Support Enforcement) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related