Kern v. Hettinger
290 F.2d 585
Opinion
When the within appeal was calendared for argument we examined the record filed by appellant. It clearly appears from that record that the appeal is premature inasmuch as the complaint sets forth a single claim for relief against multiple party defendants and there has been no final determination below as to one of these defendants.
Appeal dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Mull v. Ackerman, 2 Cir., 1960, 279 F.2d 25; Goldlawr, Inc. v. Hei-man, 2 Cir., 1959, 273 F.2d 729.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kern v. Hettinger, 290 F.2d 585 (2d Cir. 1961).
290 F.2d 585 (Kern v. Hettinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goldlawr, Inc. v. Marcus Heiman, Select Operating Corporation and United Booking Office, Inc., and Milton Shubert, William Klein and Sylvia W. Golde
273 F.2d 729 (Second Circuit, 1960)
John Joseph Mull v. Edwin Ackerman, Defendant-Respondent, Colt Co., Inc.
279 F.2d 25 (Second Circuit, 1960)