Kern v. City of Rochester
This text of 217 A.D.2d 918 (Kern v. City of Rochester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff’s motion for recusal (see, People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405; People v Bibbs, 177 AD2d 1056, lv denied 79 NY2d 918). "Where, as here, there is no allegation that recusal is statutorily required (see, Judiciary Law § 14), the matter of recusal is addressed to the discretion and personal conscience of the Justice whose recusal is sought” (Matter of Card v Siragusa, 214 AD2d 1022, 1023). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Ark, J.—Recusal.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 A.D.2d 918, 631 N.Y.S.2d 259, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kern-v-city-of-rochester-nyappdiv-1995.