Kermit Lamar Black, Jr. v. Marvin Runyon, Postmaster General

Fourth Circuit

Kermit Lamar Black, Jr. v. Marvin Runyon, Postmaster General

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10991, 1995 WL 83731

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 2, 1995

Docket94-2416

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1215 (Kermit Lamar Black, Jr. v. Marvin Runyon, Postmaster General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kermit Lamar Black, Jr. v. Marvin Runyon, Postmaster General, 48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10991, 1995 WL 83731 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kermit Lamar BLACK, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Marvin RUNYON, Postmaster General, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 94-2416.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 2, 1995.

Kermit Lamar Black, Jr., Appellant pro se. James Michael Sullivan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charlotte, NC, for appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C.A. Sec. 794 (West Supp.1994). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Black v. Runyon, No. CA-93-40 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kermit Lamar BLACK, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Marvin RUNYON, Postmaster General, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 94-2416.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 2, 1995.

Kermit Lamar Black, Jr., Appellant pro se. James Michael Sullivan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charlotte, NC, for appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C.A. Sec. 794 (West Supp.1994). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Black v. Runyon, No. CA-93-40 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10991, 1995 WL 83731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kermit-lamar-black-jr-v-marvin-runyon-postmaster-g-ca4-1995.