Kerle v. Kerle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kerle v. Kerle

700 So. 2d 127, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11193, 1997 WL 614515

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 8, 1997

DocketNo. 97-947

StatusPublished

This text of 700 So. 2d 127 (Kerle v. Kerle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kerle v. Kerle, 700 So. 2d 127, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11193, 1997 WL 614515 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/Former Husband appeals a final judgment of the trial court requiring him to pay retroactive child support and Appel-lee/Former Wife’s attorney fees and costs; Appellee/Former Wife has filed a cross-appeal as to the child custody arrangement in the trial court’s final judgment. As to the child custody arrangement and the payment of attorney fees and costs, no abuse of discretion is shown, and we affirm. However, both sides agree that there is error as to the date on which retroactive child support should commence, and we therefore must reverse and remand. The award of retroactive child support should be effective July 25,1996, the date on which Appellee’s petition for modification was filed.

Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part.

BOOTH, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/Former Husband appeals a final judgment of the trial court requiring him to pay retroactive child support and Appel-lee/Former Wife’s attorney fees and costs; Appellee/Former Wife has filed a cross-appeal as to the child custody arrangement in the trial court’s final judgment. As to the child custody arrangement and the payment of attorney fees and costs, no abuse of discretion is shown, and we affirm. However, both sides agree that there is error as to the date on which retroactive child support should commence, and we therefore must reverse and remand. The award of retroactive child support should be effective July 25,1996, the date on which Appellee’s petition for modification was filed.

Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part.

BOOTH, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

700 So. 2d 127, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11193, 1997 WL 614515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerle-v-kerle-fladistctapp-1997.