Kerins v. City of Niagara Falls

167 A.D.2d 846, 561 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14388
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 16, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs and matter remitted to respondent City Administrator for imposition of an appropriate sanction, in accordance with the following memorandum: Petitioner was terminated as a police lieutenant for using his influence to gain entrance to a tavern after legal closing hours for the purpose of obtaining alcoholic beverages. Although we conclude that there was substantial evidence to support the finding of misconduct, we deem the penalty imposed disproportionate to the offense (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233-234). Therefore, we remit the matter to respondent City Administrator to impose an appropriate sanction.

Petitioner’s remaining contentions lack merit. (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Fallon, J.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kerins v. City of Niagara Falls, 167 A.D.2d 846, 561 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14388 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

167 A.D.2d 846 (Kerins v. City of Niagara Falls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Redmond v. City of Rochester
213 A.D.2d 1042 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Smith v. Hager
185 A.D.2d 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)