Kerger v. Dentsply Internatl., Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Kerger v. Dentsply Internatl., Inc.

949 N.E.2d 14, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1525

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 17, 2011·No. 2011-0514·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 94430, 2011-Ohio-84. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right.

Upon review of Jack Bierig’s motion for admission pro hac vice, the motion was untimely. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 1.2, the motion for admission pro hac vice shall be filed with the first document the attorney files. The requirement is waived in this instance, and it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 94430, 2011-Ohio-84. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right.

Upon review of Jack Bierig’s motion for admission pro hac vice, the motion was untimely. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 1.2, the motion for admission pro hac vice shall be filed with the first document the attorney files. The requirement is waived in this instance, and it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.

Kerger v. Dentsply Internatl., Inc., 949 N.E.2d 14, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1525 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

949 N.E.2d 14 (Kerger v. Dentsply Internatl., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.