Kerger v. Dentsply Internatl., Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Kerger v. Dentsply Internatl., Inc.

949 N.E.2d 14, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1525

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 17, 2011

Docket2011-0514

StatusPublished

This text of 949 N.E.2d 14 (Kerger v. Dentsply Internatl., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kerger v. Dentsply Internatl., Inc., 949 N.E.2d 14, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1525 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 94430, 2011-Ohio-84. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right.

Upon review of Jack Bierig’s motion for admission pro hac vice, the motion was untimely. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 1.2, the motion for admission pro hac vice shall be filed with the first document the attorney files. The requirement is waived in this instance, and it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. No. 94430, 2011-Ohio-84. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right.

Upon review of Jack Bierig’s motion for admission pro hac vice, the motion was untimely. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 1.2, the motion for admission pro hac vice shall be filed with the first document the attorney files. The requirement is waived in this instance, and it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

949 N.E.2d 14, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerger-v-dentsply-internatl-inc-ohio-2011.