Kerfoot-Bell Co. v. Kerfoot

1911 OK 307, 118 P. 367, 30 Okla. 19, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 408
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedSeptember 26, 1911
Docket1115
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 1911 OK 307 (Kerfoot-Bell Co. v. Kerfoot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kerfoot-Bell Co. v. Kerfoot, 1911 OK 307, 118 P. 367, 30 Okla. 19, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 408 (Okla. 1911).

Opinion

Opinion by

AMES, C.

This is an action brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error to recover for breach of contract and for money had and received. The case was commenced on the 24th day of January, 1905, and was therefore pending upon the creation of the state. It was tried to a jury after the adoption of the Constitution, and at the trial the court instructed the jury that it might return a verdict with the concurrence of only nine of its members. A verdict was returned by 11 of the jurors, and exception saved by the plaintiff .in error.

Under the'decision of this court in Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Adams, 27 Okla. 496, 112 Pac. 1026, this was *20 error, and requires the reversal of the case. As the case must be reversed for the reason stated, it is unnecessary to pass upon the other assignments of error.

The judgment of the trial court should be reversed, and the cause remanded for further .proceedings.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gosnell v. Prince
1912 OK 598 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
McLeod v. Spencer
1912 OK 601 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Metropolitan Ry. Co. v. Fonville
1912 OK 389 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Dawson
1912 OK 392 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Smith
1912 OK 393 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Border v. Carrabine
1912 OK 89 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Taby v. McMurray
1912 OK 75 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Northern Guaranty Loan & Trust Co. v. McCurtain
1912 OK 58 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Spurrier Lumber Co. v. Dodson
1911 OK 517 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Co. v. Patterson
1911 OK 449 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1911 OK 307, 118 P. 367, 30 Okla. 19, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerfoot-bell-co-v-kerfoot-okla-1911.