Kerchner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kerchner v. State

103 So. 3d 284, 2013 WL 40326, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 187

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 2, 2013

DocketNo. 5D12-4918

StatusPublished

This text of 103 So. 3d 284 (Kerchner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kerchner v. State, 103 So. 3d 284, 2013 WL 40326, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 187 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Andria Michelle Kerchner, a criminal defendant charged with the capital offense of first-degree felony murder of a law enforcement officer, petitions this court to issue a writ of habeas corpus ordering her immediate release. She argues the trial court erred when it granted the State’s motion for pretrial detention and simultaneously denied her motion to set reasonable bond. Unfortunately, we cannot properly act on the petition. Because Kerchner has failed to supply this court with an adequate record, we are unable to review the correctness of the trial court’s ruling. See G.L. v. State, 917 So.2d 342 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Accordingly, we deny the petition without prejudice to her right to refile with an adequate record.

PETITION DENIED.

GRIFFIN, PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Andria Michelle Kerchner, a criminal defendant charged with the capital offense of first-degree felony murder of a law enforcement officer, petitions this court to issue a writ of habeas corpus ordering her immediate release. She argues the trial court erred when it granted the State’s motion for pretrial detention and simultaneously denied her motion to set reasonable bond. Unfortunately, we cannot properly act on the petition. Because Kerchner has failed to supply this court with an adequate record, we are unable to review the correctness of the trial court’s ruling. See G.L. v. State, 917 So.2d 342 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Accordingly, we deny the petition without prejudice to her right to refile with an adequate record.

PETITION DENIED.

GRIFFIN, PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 So. 3d 284, 2013 WL 40326, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerchner-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack