Kerby v. United States
348 F. App'x 197
Opinion
Jeremiah J. Kerby appeals the district court’s1 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Having carefully reviewed the matter, we conclude Kerby’s § 2255 motion is untimely and equitable tolling is not warranted. Thus, we summarily affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kerby v. United States, 348 F. App'x 197 (8th Cir. 2009).
348 F. App'x 197 (Kerby v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence
28 U.S.C. § 2255