Kepp v. Springville-Griffith Institute Central School District

55 A.D.2d 1033, 391 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10386
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 21, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 55 A.D.2d 1033 (Kepp v. Springville-Griffith Institute Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kepp v. Springville-Griffith Institute Central School District, 55 A.D.2d 1033, 391 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10386 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: The collective bargaining agreement provided that no professional staff member, tenured or nontenured, "shall be * * * dismissed without just cause”. Respondent Kepp, a probationary teacher, was dismissed at the end of his probationary period. He asserted a grievance and demanded arbitration. His only complaint appears to be that he was denied tenure, for he has not alleged any other reason for arbitration. For this reason petitioner claims that the demand for arbitration must be stayed; and we agree. We recognize, of course, that any dispute under a contract containing a clause for arbitration is presumptively arbitrable (Steelworkers v American Mfg. Co., 363 US 564; Matter of Board of Educ. [Auburn Teachers Assn.], 49 AD2d 35, 38) and that whenever there is an arbitrable issue, an arbitrator should be given the opportunity to render a lawful award (see Matter of Niagara Wheatfield Admin. Assn. v Niagara Wheatfield Cent. School Dist., 54 AD2d 498). Nevertheless, in the absence of a specific allegation of an issue to be arbitrated we find no justification for subjecting the parties to the expense and trouble of an arbitration proceeding. It is against public policy for a school board to relinquish "its authority to terminate the employment of a non-tenured teacher at the end of the probationary period”, and so the question of the termination of respondent Kepp at the end of his probationary term, "without just cause”, is not a subject for arbitration (Matter of Cohoes City School Dist. v Cohoes Teachers Assn., 40 NY2d 774, 777; Matter of Niagara Wheatfield Admin. Assn. v Niagara Wheatfield Cent. School Dist., supra; Matter of Morris Cent. School Dist. Bd. of Educ. v Morris Educ. Assn., 54 AD2d 1044; Matter of Candor Cent. School Dist. [Candor Teachers Assn.], 52 AD2d 400). (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court stay arbitration.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Moule, Simons, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Education v. Cattaraugus Teacher's Ass'n
84 A.D.2d 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
In re the Arbitration between Oneonta City School District & Oneonta Teachers Ass'n
59 A.D.2d 797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Clifton-Fine Central School Board of Education v. Wisner
59 A.D.2d 50 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Board of Education of West Genesee Central School District At Camillus v. West Genesee Teachers' Ass'n
58 A.D.2d 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Simpson v. North Collins Central School District
56 A.D.2d 166 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Matlach v. Springville-Griffith Institute Central School District
55 A.D.2d 1027 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.D.2d 1033, 391 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kepp-v-springville-griffith-institute-central-school-district-nyappdiv-1977.