Kepley v. Schmidt

21 Ill. App. 402, 1887 Ill. App. LEXIS 419
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMarch 9, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 Ill. App. 402 (Kepley v. Schmidt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kepley v. Schmidt, 21 Ill. App. 402, 1887 Ill. App. LEXIS 419 (Ill. Ct. App. 1887).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Action upon promissory note by the assignee against the maker, with defense of failure of consideration, with notice to plaintiff. An examination of the record discloses no error of the court in admitting or excluding evidence, nor in giving or refusing instructions, so far as error is assigned in that behalf. The evidence, however, while tending to show a want of consideration for the major part of the note, utterly fails to establish the fact that plaintiff bought the note with notice of such defense. He appears to be a Iona fide assignee for value before maturity, and as such, was entitled to recover. The verdict is therefore wrong, and the judgment founded thereon will be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kimmel v. Nagele
84 Ill. App. 22 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Ill. App. 402, 1887 Ill. App. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kepley-v-schmidt-illappct-1887.