Keown v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Keown v. State

512 S.E.2d 391, 236 Ga. App. 517, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 1004, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 223

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 17, 1999

DocketA99A0157

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 512 S.E.2d 391 (Keown v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keown v. State, 512 S.E.2d 391, 236 Ga. App. 517, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 1004, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 223 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Blackburn, Judge.

Wesley Hugh Keown appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, of two counts of battery and one count of simple battery. Keown raises three enumerations of error, all concerning the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions. However, Keown has failed to include a copy of the trial transcript, a stipulation of the record or an order of findings of fact entered by the trial judge with the record on appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-41 (g). Therefore, we are unable to review Keown’s assertions of error. See Sherman v. State, 142 Ga. App. 691, 692 (237 SE2d 5) (1977) (“enumerations of error going to the sufficiency of the evidence . . . cannot be considered due to the lack of a transcript or other record of these proceedings”).

Judgment affirmed.

Beasley, P. J., and Senior Appellate Judge Harold R. Banke concur. [518]*518Decided February 17, 1999. Jane K. Mitchell, for appellant. Leslie C. Abernathy, Solicitor, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blackburn, Judge.

Wesley Hugh Keown appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, of two counts of battery and one count of simple battery. Keown raises three enumerations of error, all concerning the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions. However, Keown has failed to include a copy of the trial transcript, a stipulation of the record or an order of findings of fact entered by the trial judge with the record on appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-41 (g). Therefore, we are unable to review Keown’s assertions of error. See Sherman v. State, 142 Ga. App. 691, 692 (237 SE2d 5) (1977) (“enumerations of error going to the sufficiency of the evidence . . . cannot be considered due to the lack of a transcript or other record of these proceedings”).

Judgment affirmed.

Beasley, P. J., and Senior Appellate Judge Harold R. Banke concur. [518]*518Decided February 17, 1999. Jane K. Mitchell, for appellant. Leslie C. Abernathy, Solicitor, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

512 S.E.2d 391, 236 Ga. App. 517, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 1004, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keown-v-state-gactapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack