Keough v. Central Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Keough v. Central Railroad

81 A. 989, 82 N.J.L. 529, 53 Vroom 529, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 248

DecidedNovember 20, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 81 A. 989 (Keough v. Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keough v. Central Railroad, 81 A. 989, 82 N.J.L. 529, 53 Vroom 529, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 248 (N.J. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The action in this ease was for damages sustained by the plaintiff to his property—a horse and wagon—and was founded upon the same state of facts as was disclosed in Walling v. Central Railroad Co., ante p. 504, decided at the present term. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment will be reversed and a writ venire de novo awarded.

For affirmance—Tiie Chief Justice, Swayze, Yoobhees, JJ. 3.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Cong-don, White, JJ. 10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The action in this ease was for damages sustained by the plaintiff to his property—a horse and wagon—and was founded upon the same state of facts as was disclosed in Walling v. Central Railroad Co., ante p. 504, decided at the present term. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment will be reversed and a writ venire de novo awarded.

For affirmance—Tiie Chief Justice, Swayze, Yoobhees, JJ. 3.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Cong-don, White, JJ. 10.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A. 989, 82 N.J.L. 529, 53 Vroom 529, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keough-v-central-railroad-nj-1911.