Keough v. Central Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Keough v. Central Railroad

81 A. 989, 82 N.J.L. 529, 53 Vroom 529, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 248

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 20, 1911·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The action in this ease was for damages sustained by the plaintiff to his property—a horse and wagon—and was founded upon the same state of facts as was disclosed in Walling v. Central Railroad Co., ante p. 504, decided at the present term. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment will be reversed and a writ venire de novo awarded.

For affirmance—Tiie Chief Justice, Swayze, Yoobhees, JJ. 3.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Cong-don, White, JJ. 10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The action in this ease was for damages sustained by the plaintiff to his property—a horse and wagon—and was founded upon the same state of facts as was disclosed in Walling v. Central Railroad Co., ante p. 504, decided at the present term. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment will be reversed and a writ venire de novo awarded.

For affirmance—Tiie Chief Justice, Swayze, Yoobhees, JJ. 3.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Cong-don, White, JJ. 10.

Keough v. Central Railroad, 81 A. 989, 82 N.J.L. 529, 53 Vroom 529, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 248 (N.J. 1911).

Pincite

81 A. 989 (Keough v. Central Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.