Keon v. Long Island Rail Road

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Keon v. Long Island Rail Road

263 A.D. 847, 31 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5246

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 847 (Keon v. Long Island Rail Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keon v. Long Island Rail Road, 263 A.D. 847, 31 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by an administratrix to recover damages for the death of her infant son, and damages for his pain and suffering between the time of the accident and the timé of his death, the jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff on the first cause of action and for defendant on the second cause of action. From the judgment entered thereon, and from an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict on the first [848]*848cause of action, defendant appeals. Judgment and order reversed on the facts and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by an administratrix to recover damages for the death of her infant son, and damages for his pain and suffering between the time of the accident and the timé of his death, the jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff on the first cause of action and for defendant on the second cause of action. From the judgment entered thereon, and from an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict on the first [848]*848cause of action, defendant appeals. Judgment and order reversed on the facts and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 847, 31 N.Y.S.2d 682, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keon-v-long-island-rail-road-nyappdiv-1941.