Keogh v. Breed
This text of 224 A.D.2d 180 (Keogh v. Breed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered December 5,1994, which, [181]*181after a nonjury trial, awarded judgment to plaintiff, and judgment of the same court and Justice entered December 5, 1994, awarding plaintiff $236,632.29 plus interest, costs and disbursements, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
We agree with the IAS Court that plaintiff’s vested inventory interest was not terminated pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement when defendant law firm dissolved. Dissolution does not terminate a partnership as the partnership continues until the winding up of all partnership affairs (Partnership Law § 61). The agreement provides nothing to the contrary. Further, we agree with the determination of the IAS Court that the conversations testified to at this trial were insufficient to establish a breach of fiduciary obligation (see, Graubard, Molten Dannett & Horowitz v Moskovitz, 86 NY2d 112). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 A.D.2d 180, 637 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keogh-v-breed-nyappdiv-1996.