Keo Ratha v. Rubicon Resources, LLC

129 F.4th 1212
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 4, 2025
Docket23-55299
StatusPublished

This text of 129 F.4th 1212 (Keo Ratha v. Rubicon Resources, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keo Ratha v. Rubicon Resources, LLC, 129 F.4th 1212 (9th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 4 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEO RATHA; SEM KOSAL; SOPHEA No. 23-55299 BUN; YEM BAN; NOL NAKRY; PHAN SOPHEA; SOK SANG, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-04271-JFW-AS Plaintiffs-Appellants, Central District of California, Los Angeles v. ORDER RUBICON RESOURCES, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c)

and Circuit Rule 40-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 F.4th 1212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keo-ratha-v-rubicon-resources-llc-ca9-2025.