Kenzer v. Kenzer

144 A.D.2d 439, 534 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11808
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 14, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 144 A.D.2d 439 (Kenzer v. Kenzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kenzer v. Kenzer, 144 A.D.2d 439, 534 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), entered October 7, 1986, as after a nonjury trial, dismissed the plaintiff’s cause of action for a divorce.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

After a nonjury trial, the Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff husband’s cause of action for a divorce, premised on cruel and inhuman treatment (see, Domestic Relations Law § 170 [1]). The Supreme Court determined, inter alia, that the plaintiffs testimony concerning the alleged acts of cruelty committed by the defendant lacked credibility. The court further observed that even crediting the plaintiffs contentions, they constituted, at best, "transitory discord, lack of domestic harmony and perhaps some degree of incompatibility.”

The plaintiff died on March 26, 1988, four days after his appeal was heard by this court.

[440]*440It is well settled that the death of one party to a divorce action prior to a judicial determination dissolving the marriage causes the action to abate since the marital relationship between the parties no longer exists (see, Cornell v Cornell, 7 NY2d 164, mot to amend remittitur granted 7 NY2d 987; Sperber v Schwartz, 139 AD2d 640; Davis v Davis, 75 AD2d 861, affd 52 NY2d 850).

At bar, since the plaintiff died prior to a judicial determination dissolving his marriage, the action abated and the appeal must be dismissed. Bracken, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hallinckx v. Stenbeck
307 A.D.2d 915 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Mayer v. Mayer
164 Misc. 2d 320 (New York Supreme Court, 1995)
Peterson v. Goldberg
180 A.D.2d 260 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Flournoy v. Flournoy
155 Misc. 2d 510 (New York Supreme Court, 1992)
Peterson v. Goldberg
146 Misc. 2d 474 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 A.D.2d 439, 534 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenzer-v-kenzer-nyappdiv-1988.