Kenz v. . Bernheimer Schwartz Pilsener Brewing Company
116 N.E. 1054, 220 N.Y. 708, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1170
This text of 116 N.E. 1054 (Kenz v. . Bernheimer Schwartz Pilsener Brewing Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kenz v. . Bernheimer Schwartz Pilsener Brewing Company, 116 N.E. 1054, 220 N.Y. 708, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1170 (N.Y. 1917).
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on authority of Hess v. Bernheimer & Schwartz Pilsener Brewing Co. (219 N. Y. 415).
Concur: Hiscock, Oh. J., Collin, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hess v. Bernheimer & Schwartz Pilsener Brewing Co.
114 N.E. 803 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
116 N.E. 1054, 220 N.Y. 708, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenz-v-bernheimer-schwartz-pilsener-brewing-company-ny-1917.