Kenyon v. Semon
45 N.W. 10, 43 Minn. 180, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 146
Opinion
The practice of designating the parties, either plaintiff or defendant, by the initials of their Christian names, is irregular, and has been more than once disapproved by this court; but it is no ground for the dismissal of the complaint or for a reversal of the judgment. The proper remedy, in such a case, is by motion to require the complaint to be amended or corrected in that respect. The other question sought to be raised is not involved in this appeal, at least on the present record.
Order and judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kenyon v. Semon, 45 N.W. 10, 43 Minn. 180, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 146 (Mich. 1890).
45 N.W. 10 (Kenyon v. Semon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gustafson v. Johnson
51 N.W.2d 108 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1952)
Wise v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. Relief Department
158 N.W. 711 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1916)
D'Autremont v. Anderson Iron Co.
116 N.W. 357 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)
Davis v. Jennings
111 N.W. 128 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1907)
Honeycutt v. Nyquist
74 P. 90 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1903)
Monroe Cattle Co. v. Becker
147 U.S. 47 (Supreme Court, 1893)