Kenyon v. Semon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Kenyon v. Semon

45 N.W. 10, 43 Minn. 180, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 146

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 24, 1890

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 45 N.W. 10 (Kenyon v. Semon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kenyon v. Semon, 45 N.W. 10, 43 Minn. 180, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 146 (Mich. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Mitchell, J.

The practice of designating the parties, either plaintiff or defendant, by the initials of their Christian names, is irregular, and has been more than once disapproved by this court; but it is no ground for the dismissal of the complaint or for a reversal of the judgment. The proper remedy, in such a case, is by motion to require the complaint to be amended or corrected in that respect. The other question sought to be raised is not involved in this appeal, at least on the present record.

Order and judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell, J.

The practice of designating the parties, either plaintiff or defendant, by the initials of their Christian names, is irregular, and has been more than once disapproved by this court; but it is no ground for the dismissal of the complaint or for a reversal of the judgment. The proper remedy, in such a case, is by motion to require the complaint to be amended or corrected in that respect. The other question sought to be raised is not involved in this appeal, at least on the present record.

Order and judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 N.W. 10, 43 Minn. 180, 1890 Minn. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenyon-v-semon-minn-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack