Kenyon v. Pifer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kenyon v. Pifer

255 A.D.2d 986, 679 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12264

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D.2d 986 (Kenyon v. Pifer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kenyon v. Pifer, 255 A.D.2d 986, 679 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12264 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Application unanimously granted without costs and respondent removed from office of Clerk/Treasurer of Village of Canaseraga. Memorandum: Petitioners commenced this original proceeding pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 seeking the removal of respondent from the office of Clerk-Treasurer of the Village of Canaseraga. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that respondent engaged in a pattern of intentional misconduct over a two-year period involving the misappropriation of Village funds. That misconduct justifies her removal from office (see, Matter of Abare v Hatch, 21 AD2d 84, 86; see also, Matter of West v Grant, 243 AD2d 815). (Original Proceeding Pursuant to Public Officers Law.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ. (Filed Oct. 28, 1998.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Application unanimously granted without costs and respondent removed from office of Clerk/Treasurer of Village of Canaseraga. Memorandum: Petitioners commenced this original proceeding pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 seeking the removal of respondent from the office of Clerk-Treasurer of the Village of Canaseraga. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that respondent engaged in a pattern of intentional misconduct over a two-year period involving the misappropriation of Village funds. That misconduct justifies her removal from office (see, Matter of Abare v Hatch, 21 AD2d 84, 86; see also, Matter of West v Grant, 243 AD2d 815). (Original Proceeding Pursuant to Public Officers Law.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ. (Filed Oct. 28, 1998.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D.2d 986, 679 N.Y.S.2d 859, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenyon-v-pifer-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack