Kenyon v. Pierce
This text of 36 A. 1132 (Kenyon v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion to take off the entry of discontinuance is denied. The mover is not a party to the suit, and, if the entry were taken off, could not be permitted to intervene in the suit and to prosecute the petition contrary *475 to the wishes of the defendant. Cross, Petitioner, 17 R. I. 568. If he deems that his interests as a creditor of the estate have been pre jit diced by the discontinuance of the petition and settlement of the suit made by the administrator, he can contest the allowance of the administrator’s account in the Court of .Probate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 A. 1132, 19 R.I. 474, 1896 R.I. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenyon-v-pierce-ri-1896.