Kenyatta v. Murray
This text of 838 F.2d 466 (Kenyatta v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
838 F.2d 466
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Emjumo A. KENYATTA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward MURRAY, Director, Ind. & Officially; Raymond M.
Muncy, Warden, Ind. & Officially; Patrick Gurney, Ind. &
Officially; Edward C. Morris, Ind. & Officially; Bobby W.
Soles, Ind. & Officially; Robert Ford, Ind. & Officially;
Mary Sue Terry, Ind. & Officially; Jacqueline G. Epps, Ind.
& Officially; James E. Kulp, Ind. & Officially, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 86-7347.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
March 18, 1987.
Emjumo A. Kenyatta, pro se.
Alan Katz, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the magistrate's opinion, jurisdiction premised under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c), discloses that this appeal from the magistrate's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the magistrate. Kenyatta v. Murray, C/A 86-562-R (E.D.Va., Nov. 3, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
838 F.2d 466, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 3333, 1987 WL 35060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenyatta-v-murray-ca4-1987.