Kenwell v. Lee
241 A.D. 896, 271 N.Y.S. 1023
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment appealed from modified in accordance with the decision in the appeal from the order determining the form of the judgment, and as so modified the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the defendants other than Clarence F. Lee, as supervisor of the town of Inlet, Hamilton county, N. Y., and B. J. Van Ingen & Company. Hill, P. J., MeNamee, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents on grounds stated in his opinion in Kenwell v. Lee [See post, p. 896], decided herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kenwell v. Lee, 241 A.D. 896, 271 N.Y.S. 1023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
241 A.D. 896 (Kenwell v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'Hara v. Harwood
251 A.D. 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)