Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.

361 S.W.2d 300, 1962 WL 119353
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
DecidedOctober 19, 1962
Docket(S82-60)
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 361 S.W.2d 300 (Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corp., 361 S.W.2d 300, 1962 WL 119353 (Ky. 1962).

Opinion

WADDILL, Commissioner.

Appellants seek reversal of a judgment of the Franklin Circuit Court vacating an order of the Public Service Commission of Kentucky. Under our view of the case the circuit court should have dismissed the action because it was not properly brought within the time prescribed in KRS 278.410 which in pertinent part provides:

“Any party to a proceeding before the commission or any utility affected by an order of the commission may, within twenty days after being served with the order, * * *, bring an action against the commission in the Franklin circuit court to vacate or set aside the order or determination on the ground that it is unlawful or unreasonable.”

This statute provides the exclusive method by which an order of the commission can be reviewed by the circuit court. Therefore, to obtain a review it is necessary that the action be filed against the commission, an indispensable party, within the twenty day period.

Appellee brought this action against the Kentucky Utilities Company (which was a party to the proceeding before the commission) within the twenty day period, but appellee did not make the commission a party until forty-two days after receipt of the commission’s order. Appel-lee seeks to excuse its failure to conform to the requirements of the statute by contending that no prejudice resulted to either the commission or the Kentucky Utilities Company. The contention is unavailing since the requirements of the statute are jurisdictional. See Roberts v. Watts, Ky., 258 S.W.2d 513; Ferguson v. Garland, Ky., 352 S.W.2d 70, 71.

Judgment reversed with directions to enter a judgment dismissing this action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission
382 S.W.3d 826 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 2012)
Fisher v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission
880 S.W.2d 891 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1994)
Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. Carter
689 S.W.2d 360 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1985)
Compton v. American Commercial Barge Line Co.
664 S.W.2d 950 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1984)
Green v. Bourbon County Joint Planning Commission
637 S.W.2d 626 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1982)
Energy Regulatory Commission v. Kentucky Power Co.
605 S.W.2d 46 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1980)
BOARD OF ADJUST. OF CITY OF RICHMOND v. Flood
581 S.W.2d 1 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1978)
Commonwealth, Department of Public Safety v. Lewis
441 S.W.2d 142 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
361 S.W.2d 300, 1962 WL 119353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kentucky-utilities-co-v-farmers-rural-electric-cooperative-corp-kyctapphigh-1962.