Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co. v. Barrett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co. v. Barrett

195 S.W. 1124, 176 Ky. 605, 1917 Ky. LEXIS 88

DecidedJune 22, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 195 S.W. 1124 (Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co. v. Barrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co. v. Barrett, 195 S.W. 1124, 176 Ky. 605, 1917 Ky. LEXIS 88 (Ky. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justicie Settle

Beversing. Decided upon authority of opinion in Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co. v. Murray, of this date.

As this appeal was submitted with that of the Kentucky Traction & Terminal Company v. James A. Murray, etc., and the questions presented for decision in this case are the same as in that, it is only necessary to say that the conclusions expressed in the opinion this day handed down in the Murray case must’ control the decision of this case: Hence, no additional statement of our views of the law is required.

For the reasons indicated, and by authority of the opinion in Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co. v. James A. Murray, etc., the judgment is reversed, and cause remanded for such proceedings as may be consistent with the opinion in the- Murray case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justicie Settle

Beversing. Decided upon authority of opinion in Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co. v. Murray, of this date.

As this appeal was submitted with that of the Kentucky Traction & Terminal Company v. James A. Murray, etc., and the questions presented for decision in this case are the same as in that, it is only necessary to say that the conclusions expressed in the opinion this day handed down in the Murray case must’ control the decision of this case: Hence, no additional statement of our views of the law is required.

For the reasons indicated, and by authority of the opinion in Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co. v. James A. Murray, etc., the judgment is reversed, and cause remanded for such proceedings as may be consistent with the opinion in the- Murray case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 S.W. 1124, 176 Ky. 605, 1917 Ky. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kentucky-traction-terminal-co-v-barrett-kyctapp-1917.