Kentucky Bar Association v. James E. Isenberg

511 S.W.3d 916, 2017 WL 1103420, 2017 Ky. LEXIS 74
CourtKentucky Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 23, 2017
Docket2016-SC-000663-KB
StatusUnknown

This text of 511 S.W.3d 916 (Kentucky Bar Association v. James E. Isenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kentucky Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kentucky Bar Association v. James E. Isenberg, 511 S.W.3d 916, 2017 WL 1103420, 2017 Ky. LEXIS 74 (Ky. 2017).

Opinion

OPINION AND ORDER

The Board of Governors (“Board”) for the Kentucky Bar Association (“KBA”) recommends that James E. Isenberg be permanently disbarred from the practice of law and ordered to pay all relevant costs. We agree with and adopt the Board’s recommendation. Isenberg, whose bar roster address is 6710 Foxcroft Road, Prospect, KY 40059, was admitted to the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky in 1976.

In January 2011, Isenberg was suspended from the practice of law for a period of five years. Kentucky Bar Ass’n v. Isenberg, 329 S.W.3d 327 (Ky. 2011). Despite his suspension, Isenberg continued to actively practice law, with Isenberg holding himself out to be Counsel for the Brick Layers Local Union # 1 of the Kentucky Pension Trust Fund (“Trust Fund”). Isen-berg attended Trust Fund meetings, received correspondence which identified him as Fund Counsel, and billed and re *917 ceived payment for legal services. During a three and one-half year period, Isenberg received between three and four thousand dollars from the Trust Fund. In May 2014, the Trust Fund learned that Isenberg was suspended from the practice of law and subsequently terminated him as Fund Attorney.

In November 2015, the Inquiry Commission (“Commission”) initiated a complaint against Isenberg for the above described misconduct. When efforts to serve Isen-berg were unsuccessful, service was ultimately accomplished by serving the Executive Director of the KBA pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 3.175(2). In April 2016, the Commission, pursuant to SCR 3.190, filed a charge against Isenberg alleging the same facts and allegations detailed above. Attempts to serve Isenberg were once again to no avail. In September 2016, the Commission under SCR 3.210(1) submitted the matter to the Board of Governors, due to Isenberg’s failure to answer the charge.

The charge against Isenberg alleged the following counts of misconduct: (1) SCR 3.130(5.5) (Unauthorized practice of law; multijurisdictional practice of law) for engaging in the practice of law while suspended; (2) SCR 3.130(8.4)(c) (Misconduct) for engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation; and (3) SCR 3.130(8.1) (Bar admission and disciplinary matters) for failing to respond to a lawful demand for information from an admissions or disciplinary authority.

Isenberg’s charges were submitted to the Board of Governors as a default case pursuant to SCR 3.210. Following a discussion of the charges; eighteen members of the Board voted on Isenberg’s charges. As to Counts I and II, the Board unanimously found Isenberg guilty. As to Count III, the Board found Isenberg guilty by a vote of 16 to 2. After considering the relevant authorities and Isenberg’s prior disciplinary history, the Board unanimously recommended that he be permanently disbarred from the practice of law and required to pay costs.

Having reviewed the record, we agree that the Board reached the appropriate conclusions as to Isenberg’s guilt. It is clear that Isenberg continued to practice law, in defiance of this Court’s 2011 order suspending him for five years. Further, Isenberg has failed to respond to the allegations made by Bar Counsel. Additionally, Isenberg has not filed a notice with this Court to review the Board’s decision, and we do not elect to review the decision of the Board under SCR 3.370(8). The decision of the Board is hereby adopted under SCR 3.370(10).

For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. James E. Isenberg is permanently disbarred from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky;

2. Pursuant to SCR 3.450, Isenberg is ordered to pay all costs associated with this disciplinary proceeding, in the amount of $1,702.75, for which execution may issue from this Court upon finality of this Opinion and Order;

3. Pursuant to SCR 3.390, Isenberg shall, within ten (10) days from the entry of this Opinion and Order, notify all clients, in writing, of his inability to represent them; notify, in writing, all courts in which he has matters pending of his disbarment from the practice of law; and furnish copies of all letters of notice to the Office of Bar Counsel. Furthermore, to the extent possible, Isenberg shall immediate *918 ly cancel and cease any advertising activities in which he is engaged.

/s/ John D. Minton Jr. CHIEF JUSTICE

All sitting. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

KENTUCKY BAR ASS'N v. Isenberg
329 S.W.3d 327 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
511 S.W.3d 916, 2017 WL 1103420, 2017 Ky. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kentucky-bar-association-v-james-e-isenberg-ky-2017.