Kentucky Bar Association v. Edwin L. Vardiman Jr
Opinion
TO BE PUBLISHED
S5uprrtur Guru of rith r-il gri 2016-SC-000159-KB
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION DATI; OVANT
V. IN SUPREME COURT
EDWIN L. VARDIMAN, JR. RESPONDENT KBA MEMBER NO. 90751
OPINION AND ORDER
Respondent, Edwin L. Vardiman, Jr., was admitted to the practice of law
in the Commonwealth of Kentucky on June 3, 2005. His bar roster address is
122 Highland Ave., Fort Thomas, Kentucky 41075, and his Kentucky Bar
Association (KBA) Member Number is 90751. Respondent was suspended from
practicing law in Kentucky on January 31, 2008, for his failure to comply with
continuing-legal-education requirements. He is currently on suspension.
On February 3, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio found Respondent
guilty of the following violations of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct: 4.3
(giving legal advice to an unrepresented person, other than the advice to secure
counsel, if the lawyer knows or should reasonably have known that the
interests of the unrepresented person are in conflict with the interests of the
client.); 3.3(a)(1) (knowingly making a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal); 3.3(a)(3) (knowingly offering evidence that the lawyer knows to be
false); 8.4(b) (two counts) (committing an illegal act that reflects adversely on
the lawyer's honesty or trustworthiness); 8.4(c) (two counts) (engaging in
conduct involving fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation); 8.4(d) engaging in
conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice; and 8.4(h) (engaging
in conduct that adversely reflects on the lawyer's fitness to practice law).
Cincinnati Bar Association and Warren County Bar Association v. Edwin Lowe
Vardiman, Jr., Supreme Court No. 2016-Ohio-352. In an opinion dated
February 3, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio imposed a one year suspension,
with the final six months stayed upon compliance with various conditions.
Pursuant to SCR 3.435(4), Respondent is subject to identical reciprocal
discipline in the Commonwealth of Kentucky unless he proves by substantial
evidence: (a) a lack of jurisdiction or fraud in the Ohio disciplinary action, or (b)
that his misconduct warrants substantially different discipline in this
Commonwealth.
On March 31, 2016, the KBA filed a petition for reciprocal discipline
pursuant to SCR 3.435. On April 1, 2016, this Court ordered the following:
Within twenty (20) days of the date of the entry of this order, Respondent is ordered to show cause why he should not be suspended from the practice of law for one (1) year, with the last six months stayed on conditions, as consistent with an order of identical discipline from the Supreme Court of Ohio.
Respondent failed to comply with the April 1, 2016, order.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent, Edwin L. Vardiman,
Jr., KBA Member Number 90751, is suspended from the practice of law in the
2 Commonwealth of Kentucky for one (1) year, with the last six months stayed on
conditions, as consistent with an order of identical discipline from the Supreme
Court of Ohio, effective from the entry of this opinion and order.
Pursuant to SCR 3.390, Respondent shall, if he has not already done so,
within ten (10) days from the entry of this Opinion and Order, notify all clients,
in writing, of his inability to represent them; notify, in writing, all courts in
which he has matters pending of his suspension from the practice of law; and
furnish copies of all letters of notice to the Office of Bar Counsel. Furthermore,
to the extent possible, Respondent shall immediately cancel and cease any
advertising activities in which he is engaged.
All sitting. All concur.
ENTERED: August 25, 2016. Iii, C F JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kentucky Bar Association v. Edwin L. Vardiman Jr (Kentucky Bar Association v. Edwin L. Vardiman Jr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.