KENTUCKY BAR ASS'N v. Kersey

320 S.W.3d 682, 2010 Ky. LEXIS 240, 2010 WL 3722553
CourtKentucky Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 23, 2010
Docket2010-SC-000419-KB
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 320 S.W.3d 682 (KENTUCKY BAR ASS'N v. Kersey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kentucky Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
KENTUCKY BAR ASS'N v. Kersey, 320 S.W.3d 682, 2010 Ky. LEXIS 240, 2010 WL 3722553 (Ky. 2010).

Opinion

*683 OPINION AND ORDER

The Board of Governors of the Kentucky Bar Association has recommended to this Court that Respondent, Kyle David Kersey, KB A Member No. 82097, who was admitted to practice law in Kentucky on October 30, 1987, and whose last known bar roster address is 101 West 7th Street, Corbin, KY 40701, be permanently disbarred as a result of five separate disciplinary matters which resulted in default eases under SCR 3.210. We agree with and adopt the Board’s recommendation. *684 A summary of the five bar discipline charges against Respondent follows.

File No. ism

Brandon Mills retained Kersey to represent him in an action resulting from an automobile accident. Kersey settled with the insurer for the policy limit of $25,000 and with Mills’s no-fault insurer for the unpaid PIP balance of $4,034.80. Mills signed a settlement statement in April 2004 acknowledging Kersey’s receipt of the $25,000 and showing that Mills was entitled to $18,750. 1 In May 2005, Kersey deposited the PIP payment less $200 into his business account. Mills received no money from either the liability settlement or the PIP settlement, nor did he receive a disbursement statement showing where the money went.

During the course of the investigation of this complaint, Kersey wrote three letters to Bar Counsel, indicating that Mills’s medical expenses exceeded the total recovery amount, that the medical care providers would be paid pro rata from these funds, and that he was still holding both deposits in his escrow account. However, no evidence was produced or discovered to show that any medical bills were paid from the settlement funds.

Kersey was charged by the Inquiry Commission with violating SCR 3.130-1.15(a) (failure to hold property of clients or third persons that is in the lawyer’s possession in connection with a representation separate from a lawyer’s own property); SCR 3.130-1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver to the client or third person any funds or other property that the client or third person is entitled to receive and, upon request by the client or third person not promptly rendering a full accounting regarding such property); SCR 3.130-8.1(a) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact); and SCR 3.130-8.3(c) 2 (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.) After several attempts to personally serve Ker-sey, he was constructively served with the charge through the Executive Director per SCR 3.175. No answer to the charge was filed. 3 The Board of Governors voted nineteen to zero, with one abstention, to recommend that Kersey be found guilty of all of the charges alleged in File No. 13454.

File No. 15697

Apren H. Poore retained Kersey to represent him in a claim resulting from an automobile accident that occurred in March 2006. Kersey obtained $25,000 from the liability insurance policy and $10,000 in PIP funds on behalf of Poore. Kersey advised Poore that there would be liens against any recovery in his case due to outstanding medical bills. The record reflects that before final settlement of these liens could be reached, Kersey gave Poore $5,250. However, Kersey asserts he advanced $3,050 to Poore and $4,500 to Poore’s mother.

Kersey provided records showing he deposited the liability and PIP funds into his escrow account in May 2006. The Inquiry Commission subpoenaed Kersey’s escrow bank records for October 2007 through June 2008. These records show that in the month of October 2007, his account was overdrawn by $107.40 and the liability and PIP funds were gone. No evidence was produced to show that any of Poore’s *685 medical bills were paid from the escrow account. Poore continues to receive bills regarding these unpaid medical expenses.

Respondent was charged by the Inquiry Commission with violating SCR 3.130-1.15(a) (failure to hold property of clients or third persons that is in the lawyer’s possession in connection with a representation separate from a lawyer’s own property); SCR 3.130-1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver to the client or third person any funds or other property that the client or third person is entitled to receive and, upon request by the client or third person not promptly rendering a full accounting regarding such property); SCR 3.130-8.1(a) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact); and SCR 3.130-8.3(c) 4 (engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.) After several attempts to serve Kersey, he was constructively served with the charge through the Executive Director per SCR 3.175. No answer to the charge was filed. The Board of Governors voted twenty to zero to recommend that Kersey be adjudged guilty of all of the charges alleged in File No. 15697.

File No. 15912

Shawna Ellis retained Kersey to represent her in a claim resulting from the same automobile accident which Poore was involved in that occurred in March 2006. Kersey obtained $25,000 from the liability insurance policy and $10,000 in PIP funds on behalf of Ellis. Kersey advised Ellis that there would be medical liens against any recovery in her case. Before final settlement of these liens could be reached, Kersey gave Ellis $4,250 from the insurance proceeds. Kersey deposited the remainder of the proceeds in his escrow account.

The Inquiry Commission subpoenaed Kersey’s escrow bank records for October 2007 through June 2008. These records show that in the month of October 2007, his account was overdrawn by $107.40, and Ellis’s money was gone. Despite Ellis’s requests, Kersey has failed to provide her with an accounting or itemization of the disbursements made on her behalf from the insurance proceeds, nor has any evidence been produced that any of the medical providers have been paid from the funds on deposit.

Respondent was charged by the Inquiry Commission with violating SCR 3.130-1.15(a) (failure of a lawyer to hold property of clients or third persons in his or her possession separate from the lawyer’s own property); SCR 3.130-1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver to the client or third person any funds or other property that the client or third person is entitled to receive and, upon request by the client or third person not promptly rendering a full accounting regarding such property); and SCR 3.130-8.3(c) 5 (engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.) After several attempts to serve Kersey, he was constructively served with the charge through the Executive Director per SCR 3.175. No answer to the charge was filed. The Board of Governors voted twenty to zero to recommend that Kersey be adjudged guilty of all of the charges alleged in File No. 15912.

File No. 16678

Wanda Godby retained Kersey for representation on federal criminal charges. Godby pledged her pickup truck worth $10,000 to Kersey as collateral for her legal fee of $5,000. Kersey and Godby had an oral agreement in which Godby would

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kentucky Bar Association v. James Douglas Osborne
463 S.W.3d 752 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
320 S.W.3d 682, 2010 Ky. LEXIS 240, 2010 WL 3722553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kentucky-bar-assn-v-kersey-ky-2010.