Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Conley

707 S.W.2d 343, 1986 Ky. LEXIS 259
CourtKentucky Supreme Court
DecidedApril 10, 1986
StatusPublished

This text of 707 S.W.2d 343 (Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Conley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kentucky Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Conley, 707 S.W.2d 343, 1986 Ky. LEXIS 259 (Ky. 1986).

Opinion

OPINION AND ORDER

This is a disciplinary proceeding in which the Board of Governors of the Kentucky Bar Association, by a 12-0 vote, found respondent guilty of unprofessional conduct and recommended that he be permanently disbarred from the practice of law.

We have reviewed the record and adopt the recommendation of the Board of Governors.

A 12-Count charge was filed against respondent by the Kentucky Bar Association. A resume of these charges is as follows: six counts of acceptance of legal fees and failure to file the actions contracted for; three counts of failure to perform contracted services other than filing legal actions; one count of representation of an estate in which respondent misappropriated the proceeds of a sale of property in the amount of $7,426.50, co-mingling this sum with his own personal funds; one count of failure to return fees after temporary suspension from the Kentucky Bar Association; and one count of acceptance of $2,300.00 to perfect an appeal and obtain a transcript, which money was never paid for the transcript. The appeal was never perfected and subsequently was dismissed. Respondent has failed to answer to these charges.

The respondent has failed, on two occasions, to appear before this court to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for not complying with an order of temporary suspension and a subpoena duc-es tecum. Respondent’s conduct demonstrates a total disregard for the rules and procedures of this court and the Kentucky Bar Association.

This court is of the opinion that the record demonstrates respondent’s lack of honesty and fidelity to the interests of his clients. We observe that in dealing with money belonging to his clients, the lawyer is trustee of an express trust, and failure to observe the highest standards of honesty in this respect results in disbarment. Kentucky Bar Association v. Tucker, Ky., 535 S.W.2d 97, cert. den. 423 U.S. 1054, 96 S.Ct. 785, 46 L.Ed.2d 644 (1975); and Kentucky Bar Association v. Collis, Ky., 535 S.W.2d 95, cert. den. 423 U.S. 1049, 96 S.Ct. 775, 46 L.Ed.2d 637 (1975).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that respondent be and he is hereby permanently disbarred'from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, and he is directed to pay the costs of the proceedings.

All concur.

s/Robert F. Stephens

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kentucky Bar Assoc. v. Tucker
535 S.W.2d 97 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1975)
Kentucky Bar Assoc. v. Collis
535 S.W.2d 95 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1975)
Cohen v. Anchor Hocking Glass Corp.
423 U.S. 1049 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Schwartz v. United States
423 U.S. 1054 (Supreme Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
707 S.W.2d 343, 1986 Ky. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kentucky-bar-assn-v-conley-ky-1986.