Kentha Earl McDowell v. United States
This text of 313 F.2d 638 (Kentha Earl McDowell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
313 F.2d 638
Kentha Earl McDOWELL
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
Nos. 7164, 7180.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
Feb. 5, 1963.
Thomas S. Nichols, Denver, Colo., for appellant.
Lawrence M. Henry, U.S. Atty., and Michael C. Villano, Asst. U.S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for appellee.
Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and LEWIS, Circrit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In case No. 7164, judgment affirmed February 5, 1963, without written opinion, for the reason stated in the order of the United States District Court. In case No. 7180, appeal dismissed February 5, 1963, without written opinion, since the record conclusively shows that appellant is not now serving the sentence he attacks and relief under section 2255 is not available to him. Heflin v. United States, 358 U.S. 415, 79 S.Ct. 451, 3 L.Ed.2d 407; Igo v. United States, 10 Cir., 303 F.2d 317.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
313 F.2d 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kentha-earl-mcdowell-v-united-states-ca10-1963.