Kentha Earl McDowell v. United States

313 F.2d 638
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kentha Earl McDowell v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 330 F.2d 920
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided February 5, 1963·No. 7180·Published

Opinion

313 F.2d 638

Kentha Earl McDOWELL
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

Nos. 7164, 7180.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 5, 1963.

Thomas S. Nichols, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Lawrence M. Henry, U.S. Atty., and Michael C. Villano, Asst. U.S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and LEWIS, Circrit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In case No. 7164, judgment affirmed February 5, 1963, without written opinion, for the reason stated in the order of the United States District Court. In case No. 7180, appeal dismissed February 5, 1963, without written opinion, since the record conclusively shows that appellant is not now serving the sentence he attacks and relief under section 2255 is not available to him. Heflin v. United States, 358 U.S. 415, 79 S.Ct. 451, 3 L.Ed.2d 407; Igo v. United States, 10 Cir., 303 F.2d 317.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kentha Earl McDowell v. United States, 313 F.2d 638 (10th Cir. 1963).

313 F.2d 638 (Kentha Earl McDowell v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heflin v. United States
358 U.S. 415 (Supreme Court, 1959)
Marvin Joe Igo v. United States
303 F.2d 317 (Tenth Circuit, 1962)