Kent v. State of Washington

• Court: District Court, W.D. Washington
• Decided: May 1, 2020
• Docket: 2:20-cv-00296
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 MELVIN D. KENT, CASE NO. C20-0296-JCC 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 v. 12 STATE OF WASHINGTON, 13 Respondent. 14

15 This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner’s objections (Dkt. No. 9) to the report 16 and recommendation of the Honorable Michelle L. Peterson, United States Magistrate Judge 17 (Dkt. No. 8). Petitioner seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 from a 2006 judgment and sentence 18 of the Snohomish County Superior Court. (See Dkt. No. 5-1 at 1.) Judge Peterson recommends 19 that the Court dismiss Petitioner’s habeas petition without prejudice because he has not 20 exhausted his state court remedies. (Dkt. No. 8 at 2.) Petitioner concedes that he did not present 21 his federal habeas claims to the state courts for review, but he argues that those claims were 22 “vicariously” exhausted because a different individual, Scott Fischer, unsuccessfully appealed 23 his conviction to the Washington Supreme Court. (See Dkt. No. 9 at 1.) However, one individual 24 cannot vicariously exhaust another individual’s habeas claims because habeas claims are 25 personal to each individual. See McKinney v. Ryan, 730 F.3d 903, 912 (9th Cir. 2013). 26 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows: 1 1. Petitioner’s objections (Dkt. No. 9) are OVERRULED; 2 2. Judge Peterson’s report and recommendation (Dkt. No. 8) is APPROVED and 3 ADOPTED; 4 3. Petitioner’s habeas petition is DISMISSED without prejudice; 5 4. Petitioner is DENIED a certificate of appealability; and 6 5. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send copies of this order to Petitioner and to Judge Peterson. 7 DATED this 1st day of May 2020. A 8 9 10 John C. Coughenour 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26