Kent v. State

8 Blackf. 163, 1846 Ind. LEXIS 93
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 18, 1846
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 Blackf. 163 (Kent v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kent v. State, 8 Blackf. 163, 1846 Ind. LEXIS 93 (Ind. 1846).

Opinion

Perkins, J.

Indictment for failing to return a marriage certificate. Motion to quash overruled. Plea, guilty, and fine assessed by the Court.

The indictment shows it to have been but three months and fourteen days from the time of the marriage to the filing of the certificate. The statute on which the indictment is founded, R. S. 1838, p. 411, requires, by sects. 6 and 8, that the certificate of marriage shall be filed in the clerk’s office of the proper county in three months from the solemnization of the marriage, and imposes a penalty of five dollars a month for delay after the said three months ;• and the question is, whether any fine can be imposed for a delay of less than a full month from the expiration of the three months ? The Court below held the affirmative, and assessed a fine of two dollars and a half for the half month.

We think the Court erred. This is a penal statute and must be strictly construed. It certainly is not clear that a penalty is inflicted by it till the end of the fourth month’s delay; and if it is ambiguous, and susceptible of two constructions consistent with reason, one of which will acquit and the other convict the defendant, that construction which will acquit must be adopted.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schilling v. State
18 N.E. 682 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Blackf. 163, 1846 Ind. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kent-v-state-ind-1846.