Kent v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Kent v. State

215 S.E.2d 331, 134 Ga. App. 573, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2086

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 18, 1975·No. 49977·Published

Opinion

Quillian, Judge.

The defendant was tried and convicted of violation of the Georgia Drug Abuse Control Act. An appeal was filed and the case is here for review. Held:

1. The evidence though in conflict was sufficient to authorize a finding that the execution of the search warrant was valid. See Code Ann. § 27-308 (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 567, 570).

2. The overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell, P. J., and Clark, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian, Judge.

The defendant was tried and convicted of violation of the Georgia Drug Abuse Control Act. An appeal was filed and the case is here for review. Held:

1. The evidence though in conflict was sufficient to authorize a finding that the execution of the search warrant was valid. See Code Ann. § 27-308 (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 567, 570).

2. The overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell, P. J., and Clark, J., concur.

Kent v. State, 215 S.E.2d 331, 134 Ga. App. 573, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 2086 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

215 S.E.2d 331 (Kent v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.