Kent v. Sibley

5 N.Y.S. 448, 23 N.Y. St. Rep. 1006, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3037
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided May 9, 1889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The original notice of appeal was from the judgment. The error occurred from making the copies of the notice to be served; and under section 1303 of the Code, where an appeal had been taken in good faith, any defect may be cured. We therefore think that the order should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kent v. Sibley, 5 N.Y.S. 448, 23 N.Y. St. Rep. 1006, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3037 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

5 N.Y.S. 448 (Kent v. Sibley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rothenberg v. Metzger
227 A.D. 444 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)