Kent v. Security State Bank
This text of 1925 OK 827 (Kent v. Security State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The Security State Bank commenced its action against O. I. Kent et al. for debt. The t,rial of the cause resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendants have appealed the cause for review. The only assignment of error ^ relied upon by the plaintiff in error for' reversal is that there is not sufficient Evidence to support the verdict in favor 'of the plaintiff. The defendants did not interpose a demurrer to the evidence in the trial of the cause, or request the court to instruct the jury to return a verdict for the defendants.
The rule is that the assignment of erro,r, that the verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence, does not present error for review here, unless the complaining party suffered an adverse ruling upon a demurrer to the evidence, o,r a request for an instructed verdict in the trial of the cause.
It is recommended that the judgment be affirmed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1925 OK 827, 240 P. 624, 112 Okla. 154, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kent-v-security-state-bank-okla-1925.