Home/Superior Court of Delaware/Kent v. Pyle

Kent v. Pyle

45 A. 716, 18 Del. 242, 2 Penne. 242, 1899 Del. LEXIS 37
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedSeptember 29, 1899
DocketRule to show cause why writ of possession should not issue No. 72
StatusPublished

This text of 45 A. 716 (Kent v. Pyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kent v. Pyle, 45 A. 716, 18 Del. 242, 2 Penne. 242, 1899 Del. LEXIS 37 (Del. Ct. App. 1899).

Opinion

Lore, C. J.:

We think that would be too narrow a construction to give to the statute. It would practically defeat the remedial character of the statute in certain cases.

Let the rule for a writ of possession be issued with stay of execution for fifteen days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 A. 716, 18 Del. 242, 2 Penne. 242, 1899 Del. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kent-v-pyle-delsuperct-1899.