Kent v. Phelps
2 Day 483
Opinion
were unanimously of opinion, that the direction to the jury, on the first point, was correct ; but reversed the judgment, Chester, Brace, E. Goodrich, and llos-mer, Assts. dissenting, on the ground, that it ought to have been left to the jury, as a question of fact for them to decide, whether the whole transaction was, or was not, a cover for usury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kent v. Phelps, 2 Day 483 (Colo. 1807).
2 Day 483 (Kent v. Phelps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Money Mailer, LLC v. Brewer
Washington Supreme Court, 2019
Associated Inves. v. Williams Assoc., No. Cv90-031085 (Feb. 18, 1992)
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 1341 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1992)
Williams v. Bryan
5 S.W. 401 (Texas Supreme Court, 1887)
Smith v. Wolf
8 N.W. 429 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1881)
Brown v. Harrison
17 Ala. 774 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1850)
Suydam v. Westfall
4 Hill & Den. 211 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1843)
De Forest v. Strong
8 Conn. 513 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1831)
Lloyd v. Keach
2 Conn. 175 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1817)