Kent v. McIntosh

151 So. 698, 112 Fla. 745
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 16, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 151 So. 698 (Kent v. McIntosh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kent v. McIntosh, 151 So. 698, 112 Fla. 745 (Fla. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted from the transcript of the record of the final decree herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no reversible error in the said decree. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed. See Wheeler v. Sullivan, 106 Fla. 109, 142 So. 817; 6 C. J. 368-640.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wheeler v. Sullivan
142 So. 817 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 So. 698, 112 Fla. 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kent-v-mcintosh-fla-1933.