Kent v. Mayor of Wilmington

32 A. 464, 12 Del. 397, 7 Houston 397, 1886 Del. LEXIS 11
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided December 3, 1886·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Comegys, C. J.,

charged the jury: The duty of the city is to keep the streets of it in a good and safe passable condition. The degree of diligence required of the city in the case of such work as was done in filling up the trench cut on Fourth street in August, 1885, for the purpose of laying a water pipe, is such and no more, as that which a good business man would have shown under like circumstances, Whar. on Neg., Sec., 48. The want of such diligence is ordinary negligence, Ibid., 49.

Verdict for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kent v. Mayor of Wilmington, 32 A. 464, 12 Del. 397, 7 Houston 397, 1886 Del. LEXIS 11 (Del. Ct. App. 1886).

32 A. 464 (Kent v. Mayor of Wilmington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co. v. Nelson
188 A. 39 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1936)