Kent v. Frost

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Kent v. Frost

124 S.E. 812, 32 Ga. App. 764, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 641

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 7, 1924

Docket15585

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 124 S.E. 812 (Kent v. Frost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kent v. Frost, 124 S.E. 812, 32 Ga. App. 764, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 641 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. In a garnishment proceeding, where indebtedness is admitted to the defendant, a claimant cannot legally obtain judgment in his favor without traversing the answer of the garnishee. Booth v. Brooke, 6 Ga. App. 299 (64 S. E. 1103). The court properly directed a verdict for the plaintiff in fl. fa.

2. Neither upon the ground of newly discovered evidence nor for any reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. W. B. Kent, for plaintiffs in error. B. B. Jackson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI