Kent v. Frost

124 S.E. 812, 32 Ga. App. 764, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 641
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 7, 1924·No. 15585·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. In a garnishment proceeding, where indebtedness is admitted to the defendant, a claimant cannot legally obtain judgment in his favor without traversing the answer of the garnishee. Booth v. Brooke, 6 Ga. App. 299 (64 S. E. 1103). The court properly directed a verdict for the plaintiff in fl. fa.

2. Neither upon the ground of newly discovered evidence nor for any reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. W. B. Kent, for plaintiffs in error. B. B. Jackson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kent v. Frost, 124 S.E. 812, 32 Ga. App. 764, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 641 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

124 S.E. 812 (Kent v. Frost) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pope v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
21 S.E.2d 289 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)