Kent v. Davis

15 S.E. 457, 89 Ga. 151
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 31, 1892·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

[151] Judgment affirmed.

The defendants demurred on the following grounds : The allegations in the declaration do not entitle plaintiffs to the relief sought or any other relief; the title to the personalty mentioned is not in plaintiffs, the right to sue being only in the administrator of Bryant Kent; and defendant Downs has a good title by prescription to the land of which he is alleged to be in possession. The demurrer was overruled, and the defendants excepted. W. R. Daley, Evans & Evans, T. H. Potter, and Hines, Shubricic & Eelber, for plaintiffs in error. A. E. Daley, by brief, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kent v. Davis, 15 S.E. 457, 89 Ga. 151 (Ga. 1892).

15 S.E. 457 (Kent v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Payne v. Home Savings Bank
18 S.E.2d 770 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Cleaveland v. LaGrange Banking & Trust Co.
200 S.E. 137 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Hardeman v. Ellis
135 S.E. 195 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Reeves v. Tarnok
131 S.E. 891 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Ansley v. Ansley
114 S.E. 182 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Moughon v. Masterson
79 S.E. 561 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
White v. Bailey
64 S.E. 1019 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1909)
Pierce v. Middle Georgia Land & Lumber Co.
61 S.E. 1114 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Kytle v. Kytle
57 S.E. 748 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Belt v. Lazenby
56 S.E. 81 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Eagan v. Conway
41 S.E. 493 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)