Kent v. Davis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Kent v. Davis

15 S.E. 457, 89 Ga. 151

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 31, 1892

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 15 S.E. 457 (Kent v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kent v. Davis, 15 S.E. 457, 89 Ga. 151 (Ga. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

[151]*151 Judgment affirmed.

The defendants demurred on the following grounds : The allegations in the declaration do not entitle plaintiffs to the relief sought or any other relief; the title to the personalty mentioned is not in plaintiffs, the right to sue being only in the administrator of Bryant Kent; and defendant Downs has a good title by prescription to the land of which he is alleged to be in possession. The demurrer was overruled, and the defendants excepted.

W. R. Daley, Evans & Evans, T. H. Potter, and Hines, Shubricic & Eelber, for plaintiffs in error. A. E. Daley, by brief, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[151]*151 Judgment affirmed.

The defendants demurred on the following grounds : The allegations in the declaration do not entitle plaintiffs to the relief sought or any other relief; the title to the personalty mentioned is not in plaintiffs, the right to sue being only in the administrator of Bryant Kent; and defendant Downs has a good title by prescription to the land of which he is alleged to be in possession. The demurrer was overruled, and the defendants excepted.

W. R. Daley, Evans & Evans, T. H. Potter, and Hines, Shubricic & Eelber, for plaintiffs in error. A. E. Daley, by brief, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 S.E. 457, 89 Ga. 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kent-v-davis-ga-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack