Kent v. Buttarazzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kent v. Buttarazzi

29 A.D.2d 842, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4590

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 22, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 842 (Kent v. Buttarazzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kent v. Buttarazzi, 29 A.D.2d 842, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal denied without prejudice to renew upon a showing that the appeal does not involve “ a fundamental jurisdictional question of fact as to the petition’s sufficiency or a triable issue of fact determination of which against petitioner would render the petition fatally defective”. (Great Neck Water Auth. v. Citizens Water Supply Co. of Newtown, 12 N Y 2d 167, 173.) In the event of such renewal, the motion papers should include, among other things, a cony of the petition and of the answer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeal denied without prejudice to renew upon a showing that the appeal does not involve “ a fundamental jurisdictional question of fact as to the petition’s sufficiency or a triable issue of fact determination of which against petitioner would render the petition fatally defective”. (Great Neck Water Auth. v. Citizens Water Supply Co. of Newtown, 12 N Y 2d 167, 173.) In the event of such renewal, the motion papers should include, among other things, a cony of the petition and of the answer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 842, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kent-v-buttarazzi-nyappdiv-1968.