Kent v. Buda Foundry & Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Kent v. Buda Foundry & Manufacturing Co.

131 Ill. App. 65, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 6

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided January 7, 1907·No. Gen. No. 12,530; Gen. No. 12,532·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

These appeals are from the same decree. In each of them the transcript is certified to be per praecipe, and contains only the decree appealed from and the appeal bond, although it plainly appears from the decree that the cause was heard on- the pleadings and the master’s report, which included the evidence and his conclusions of fact and law. There is nothing in the transcript, in either of the appeals, to show that the appellant filed any exceptions to the master’s report.

The decree in each of the appeals will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Brown took no part in the consideration or decision of these appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

These appeals are from the same decree. In each of them the transcript is certified to be per praecipe, and contains only the decree appealed from and the appeal bond, although it plainly appears from the decree that the cause was heard on- the pleadings and the master’s report, which included the evidence and his conclusions of fact and law. There is nothing in the transcript, in either of the appeals, to show that the appellant filed any exceptions to the master’s report.

The decree in each of the appeals will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Brown took no part in the consideration or decision of these appeals.

Kent v. Buda Foundry & Manufacturing Co., 131 Ill. App. 65, 1907 Ill. App. LEXIS 6 (Ill. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

131 Ill. App. 65 (Kent v. Buda Foundry & Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.