Kent v. Brooklyn Eagle, Inc.
This text of 2 A.D.2d 699 (Kent v. Brooklyn Eagle, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for an alleged libel, the appeal is from an order denying a motion for a preference, pursuant to rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The motion was made on the ground that the corporate respondent will liquidate its affairs and have no funds left to pay any judgment if the case proceeds to trial under normal calendar conditions. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 A.D.2d 699, 153 N.Y.S.2d 592, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kent-v-brooklyn-eagle-inc-nyappdiv-1956.