Kent v. Aurora Products Corp.

41 N.Y. 836
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 10, 1977
StatusPublished

This text of 41 N.Y. 836 (Kent v. Aurora Products Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kent v. Aurora Products Corp., 41 N.Y. 836 (N.Y. 1977).

Opinion

[837]*837Order affirmed, with costs. No agreement had been reached and there is no proof that the defendant wrongfully or arbitrarily prevented consummation of the negotiations (see Kaelin v Warner, 27 NY2d 352, 355).

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kaelin v. Warner
267 N.E.2d 86 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 N.Y. 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kent-v-aurora-products-corp-ny-1977.